| |
Shop
| |  |
|
 Best Sellers |  | Home  RIGGS WORKWEAR by Wrangler Men's Ranger Pant, Loden | |
|  | |  | | | RIGGS WORKWEAR by Wrangler Men's Ranger Pant, Loden | | | | | | | |
List Price:
| | |
Our Price:
| $39.99 - $54.99 | |
You Save:
| |
| | | SKU:
ZZX3*0118388000000 | | Availability:
In stock | | |
|
| | Color | |  |
| | Features | 10 oz. 100% Cotton ripstop fabric, color Loden is a shade of greenroom2move Fit with Gusset crotch1000 denier DuPont Cordura® lined back pocketsPatented tape measure reinforcement on right front pocket and roomy side pocketsMachine wash warm with like colors only Non-chlorine bleach when needed Tumble dry low
|  |
| | Description | Men's Riggs Workwear Ranger Pants These Riggs Workwear Ranger Pants keep your tools and other gear close at hand with roomy side cargo pockets! Plus they're comfortable and durable... everything you'd expect from Riggs Workwear : 10-oz. 100% cotton ripstop fabric; 13" deep front pockets; Patented leather tape measure reinforcement on right front pocket; 1,000-denier Cordura lined back pockets; Right side hammer loop; Reinforced knees with bottom vent; Roomy side cargo pockets with flaps and concealed snaps; Oversized watch pocket; Machine wash / dry. Imported. State Size. Get yours now! Men's Riggs Workwear 36" Inseam Ranger Pants, Loden |  |
| | Product Details | | Product Length: | 41.5 inches | | Product Width: | 0.5 inches | | Product Height: | 23.0 inches | | Package Length: | 16.0 inches | | Package Width: | 14.0 inches | | Package Height: | 1.0 inches | | Package Weight: | 1.86 pounds | | Average Customer Rating: | based on 70 reviews |
|  |
| | Customer Reviews | Average Customer Review: ( 70 customer reviews )
Write an online review and share your thoughts with other customers.
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
60 of 63 found the following review helpful:
RIGGS vs. Carhartt Canvas Apr 09, 2009
By M. Malovich I've never really been a "Jeans" type person. Some cuts and colors looked all right on me, but I quickly found that other pant types suited me better. Particularly cargo pants. In a search for some decent-looking, colorful, hearty cargo pants, I came to Amazon. Two brands kept popping up near the top of the lists: Carhartt and Wrangler's RIGGS. So, after owning them both for a little while, here's a comparison:
Wranglers RIGGS Pros:
-Very durable material, and double/triple stitched. It's slightly thicker than the Carhartt canvas pants, and the pants (as a whole) definitely weigh a few more ounces. The "Rip Stop Technology" is visible, and is basically a thicker strand of material lining horizontally across the length of the pants. I haven't put it to heavy testing, as I like my pants whole, but I can see the material stopping minor tears.
-Pockets. The RIGGS have more pockets than the Carhartts. The two leg-pockets are larger and button-down to close (something the Carhartt's lack). There are two smaller pockets more than the Carhartt's, about the size of a flip-top cell-phone and one that's cut at an angle (probably for rulers, but I use it for lip balm, mini-bungies while I'm riding my bike, and other small thumb-sized things). I have to say, I like the RIGG's pockets more. If this kind of thing is important to you: The hammer loop is on the RIGHT side. Carhartt's is on the LEFT.
-Leather tab on right-front pocket. It's stylish, but more than that - it's functional. If you constantly clip things to your pockets (measuring tape, cell phone holster, Leatherman, etc.) then you're not damaging the seems of your pockets with the little leather patch.
-The knees are double-thick from just below the front pockets to the shins.
Wrangler RIGGs Cons:
-They come a little shorter than the Carhartt's. I wear a 34W x 36L and the Carhartt's seem to have about 1" over the RIGGs in length.
-This is probably due to my own issues (shared washing facilities, too much soap?), but after washing the RIGGs once they were suddenly very "distressed." The fabric seemed fine, but it was if they were washed in mild bleach. Again, this is probably my fault, but it only happened to the pants. Just a warning.
Carhartt Canvas Pros:
-Casual look. I have to admit, the RIGGs are nice on the eyes if you have a "rougher" style, but if you want something more casual and even EASIER on the eyes, the Carhartt's win. They just plain look a bit more sleek. They also come in more colors.
-Cheaper. The Carhartt's I found for roughly $25/pair online. The RIGGs I've found for about ~$35/pair. If they wear the same, the Carhartt's may be the better value.
-Fit. The Carhartt's fit better. They're slightly longer than the RIGGs, and have a more "tailored" feel to them.
-Fabric and double/triple stitching. It may not feel as robust as the RIGG's, but it does definitely feel more rugged than your average pair of jeans (and far more rugged than thin 'designer' pairs). It's also smoother than the RIGGs, giving the pants a smoother, slightly more stylish look.
Carhartt's Canvas Cons:
-Pockets. Make no mistakes, I find anything with more than two pockets a good thing, but there are a few mishaps. The main cargo pockets don't close, and are about the size of my hand (minus the thumb). The RIGGs pockets do button-shut, and can fit my full cupped hand. There's also a few less pockets on the Carhartts, but it shouldn't usually be a problem. What I find slightly more annoying is the belt-loop placement. It sits directly, vertically over the left (slightly-smaller-than-the-right) cargo pocket. When I go to put things in the left cargo pocket, I often hit the belt loop first and spend a few extra seconds fumbling for the right spot.
-The fabric wrinkles easier than the RIGGs. It's lighter, but not so light that you can quickly pat them down or leave them to hang. They might be prime candidates for steam-pressing, but I've not had the opportunity to try. The RIGGs are probably not light enough for steam-pressing, and if they're wrinkled badly, you're looking at nothing short of an iron to get them back to smooth.
Conclusion: Overall, I'm a bit split. It really depends on how long they last (and I expect both to go for years under moderate use). The Carhartt's are definitely more appealing stylistically, and I can use them in a wider range of outfits. The RIGGs, I feel, are more rugged and suited to heavier use. Both feel more rugged than jeans, and I like the comfort in knowing that I don't have to worry about worn out knees or random rips for some time. I'm definitely a "quality over quantity" person, and both pairs have quality look and feel.
In the end, both get 4 stars from me. I love 'em, and I'm glad I have both.
16 of 19 found the following review helpful:
hi tech trumps the Gold Rush Jun 03, 2006
By Miles L. Shafer these are the best pants since Levis came up with the 501 for the 49ers (the real 49ers, not the sad NFL team of today).
I work in these pants nearly every day since I discovered them on the recommendation of the local feed store proprieter ("these are great pants!). I've yet to detect a manufacturing flaw and they shrug off the effects of everything from manure to plaster dust.
The hammer loop is on the logical side for once and I'm still trying to remember that I have cargo pockets and don't need to tote the toolbelt. and a cell-phone pocket! the new classics.
7 of 7 found the following review helpful:
The pants of GOD. Dec 16, 2008
By A. cole
"Radioace Tech"
It's been over a year now and I am still wearing these ripstop material pants to work frequently and they show little signs of wear no matter how I abuse them. The denim version is not as good as the ripstop version. I already retired the denim ones that I purchased at the same time. Plenty of pockets, warm in winter, cool in summer. Comfortable and roomy fit for anyone who is "pants particular". Well worth the money. If God needed pants, he would be wearing these! I'm buying more!
14 of 17 found the following review helpful:
MULTI PURPOSE Mar 25, 2007
By William H. Ferguson THESE TROUSERS ARE COMFORTABLE FOR HOT WEATHER AND LOOSE ENOUGH FOR THERMALS IN COLD.THE CARGO POCKETS AREHANDY TOGETHER WITH A CELL PHONE POCKET.THEY ALSO FIT GREAT FOR MOTORCYCLE WEAR,HOWEVER THERE IS LITTLE CRASH PROTECTION.TO AVOID FADE WASH THEM IN COLD WATER.
5 of 5 found the following review helpful:
Very good quality Nov 06, 2007
By K. Bolze
"Busy mom"
My husband loves these pants as they fit well and they have a rugged, sturdy quality. A deifinte must for anyone who works hard as they will take a beating. I just wash them regularly and they come out as good as new!
See all 70 customer reviews on Amazon.com
|  |
| |
| |  | |  |
|
|  You may also like ... |